

“The sad fact in this case was what did NAR have to spend to defend such a common sense decision?” said Keller Williams co-founder Joe Williams.


Some viewed the DOJ’s investigation as a classic example of “government overreach” and lauded the court’s decision. On Monday the court gave the DOJ until March 13 to submit its brief and gave NAR until April 20 to submit an answering brief in the case.Īgents, brokers and others commenting on Inman’s article about the NAR-DOJ ruling were mixed regarding their thoughts on the ruling and on the NAR rules at issue. Last week, the DOJ asked to submit an amicus brief in one such case regarding the Clear Cooperation Policy and an appeals court granted the agency’s request.

Regardless, these rules will continue to be debated as they are also the subjects of multiple antitrust lawsuits filed against NAR filed by private parties, some of which the DOJ has intervened in and appears poised to continue to get involved in. It’s unclear at this point what the ruling means for the DOJ’s investigation into NAR’s policies or if the agency will appeal the district court’s decision.
